October 22, 2025

White House East Wing demolition begins for planned "State Ballroom" addition

East Wing demolition proceeds despite historic preservation groups warning it could overwhelm White House itself

Demolition work began on the White House East Wing in late October 2025 as the administration moves forward with plans for a roughly 90,000‑square‑foot State Ballroom addition. On October 22, 2025, President Trump said the project was "about $300 million," up from earlier public estimates of $200–$250 million.

The National Trust for Historic Preservation sent an October 21 letter urging a pause and formal review, warning the proposed addition could "overwhelm the White House itself.

" The White House says private donors and the president will fund the project; preservation groups say legally required advisory reviews should proceed before further demolition.

Demolition activity affecting the East Wing began in mid‑to‑late October 2025 as crews removed portions of the historic façade to make way for a planned addition the White House describes as about 90,000 total square feet. (White House statements and contemporaneous reporting.)

President Trump told reporters on October 22, 2025 that the ballroom project is "about $300 million," higher than prior public estimates reported in July–October 2025 of roughly $200–$250 million. (Presidential remarks reported across outlets.)

The National Trust for Historic PreservationNational Trust for Historic Preservation sent a letter dated October 21, 2025 urging the Administration and the National Park Service to pause demolition until the proposal undergoes public review by agencies such as the National Capital Planning Commission and the Commission of Fine Arts, saying the addition could "overwhelm the White House itself."

The East Wing has traditionally housed offices associated with the First Lady and the visitor entrance for public tours. The administration says historically significant elements have been documented and stored under supervision during construction, but public details on specific room relocations and schedules remained incomplete in initial reporting.

The White House has described the work as privately funded by the president and private donors. Preservation groups and planning agencies have emphasized that funding sources do not remove the need for advisory review and public comment for projects affecting the historic site.

🏛️Government🚇Infrastructure

What You Can Do

1

Demand NCPC enforce White House review laws

2

Join National Trust lawsuit via amicus brief