Skip to main content

December 1, 2025

Trump fires 8 immigration judges in New York City

Amnewyork
Documented NY
Wendy Barlow
TRAC
NPR
+33

Judges with immigration defense backgrounds fired at higher rates

The Trump administration fired eight immigration judges in New York City on Dec. 1, 2025, all based at 26 Federal Plaza in Manhattan. The firings were confirmed by the National Association of Immigration Judges and a Justice Department official speaking anonymously. Among those dismissed was Amiena Khan, the Assistant Chief Immigration Judge who supervised other judges at 26 Federal Plaza, the downtown Manhattan complex housing the city's main immigration court and local ICE headquarters.

The fired NYC judges had asylum grant rates significantly higher than the national average. According to government data from TRAC (Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse), the seven judges fired on Dec. 1 granted asylum 85.5% of the time on average—more than 20 percentage points higher than New York's average before Trump took office. Immigration Judge David S. Kim, who was fired, had the highest asylum approval rate of all immigration judges at 26 Federal Plaza. Between 2019-2024, Assistant Chief Judge Amiena Khan ruled on 620 asylum cases and granted 544, denying only 10.3% compared to 34.8% denied by other NYC immigration judges.

Immigration judges lack the independence protections of Article III federal judges. They're civil servants appointed by the Attorney General, not Article III judges with lifetime tenure appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) operates within the Department of Justice, creating a structural conflict where DOJ both employs the 'neutral' judges and serves as the prosecutor (through DHS) seeking deportations. The Attorney General can personally take any immigration case, decide it, and bind every immigration judge nationwide with that decision.

The Dec. 1 firings were part of a broader purge of immigration judges nationwide. By Dec. 2025, approximately 90 immigration judges had been fired across the United States during the year, with only 36 replacements hired. The immigration judge workforce dropped from about 700 at the beginning of 2025 to below 600 by Dec.. Of the 18 judges who left the bench since Jan. 2025, only three were former ICE prosecutors while 12 had represented immigrants before their appointments, suggesting Trump targeted judges with immigration defense backgrounds.

Amiena Khan was specifically targeted on the Heritage Foundation-funded 'DHS Bureaucrat Watchlist' that aims to identify 'subversive' federal workers. The watchlist targeted Khan for her work with the National Association of Immigration Judges union and her advocacy against Trump's Department of Justice attempts to dissolve the union during Trump's first term. Khan had publicly opposed DOJ interference in judicial independence, making her a target for dismissal when Trump returned to office.

The firings exacerbate an already severe immigration court backlog exceeding 3.7 million pending cases nationwide. New York alone has 338,388 pending cases in its immigration courts. Each fired judge leaves behind thousands of scheduled cases. One former immigration judge stated their backlog was already filled through 2027, and with the firings, hearing dates would be pushed back to 2028 or later. Immigration attorneys warn the mass firings create a 'climate of fear' where remaining judges fear granting asylum at rates that might trigger their own dismissal.

Immigration Judge Tania Nemer filed a lawsuit against the Department of Justice after being fired, alleging discrimination based on her gender, dual citizenship with Lebanon, and her previous candidacy for local office as a Democrat. A group of terminated immigration judges filed a class appeal before the Merit Systems Protection Board challenging the mass firings. Legal challenges argue the firings violate due process and judicial independence protections, though immigration judges lack the constitutional protections of Article III judges.

The systematic targeting of judges with high asylum grant rates transforms immigration courts from neutral adjudicators into deportation machinery. Immigration attorney Ramon Guerra stated the firings send 'a very chilling message to any immigration judge to toe the party line,' warning judges may think 'if I don't maintain a certain amount of deportations, I'm going to get in trouble.' This politicization of immigration courts undermines due process for the 3.7 million people with pending cases who have constitutional rights to fair hearings regardless of immigration status.

🛂Immigration⚖️Justice🏛️Government

Test Your Knowledge

10

5 more questions available

Upgrade to Premium to access all practice questions and unlock advanced quiz features.

Upgrade to Premium

These questions are part of the Trump fires 8 immigration judges in New York City topic. Master this topic by completing the quiz or exploring each question in detail.

Ready to test your knowledge?

Take the full quiz to master this topic and track your progress.

Start Quiz

People, bills, and sources

Amiena Khan

Assistant Chief Immigration Judge, 26 Federal Plaza (fired)

David S. Kim

Immigration Judge, 26 Federal Plaza (fired)

Tania Nemer

Immigration Judge (fired)

Teresa L. Riley

Chief Immigration Judge, EOIR

Donald Trump

Donald Trump

President of the United States

Ramon Guerra

New York immigration attorney

What you can do

1

civic action

Report immigration court due process violations to legal aid organizations

If you're an immigrant with a pending case and your judge was fired, leaving you without scheduled hearings or forcing rescheduling years into the future, document these delays and due process violations. Report them to immigration legal aid organizations building records of harm caused by the mass judge firings.

My immigration court hearing was scheduled for [date] with Judge [name] at 26 Federal Plaza, but the judge was fired on Dec. 1, 2025. My case has been rescheduled to [year], delaying my asylum hearing by [X] years. This violates my due process right to a timely hearing. I need legal help challenging this delay and documenting how the Trump administration's mass firing of immigration judges denies fair adjudication.

2

civic action

Support legislation creating independent Article III immigration courts

Immigration judges lack constitutional protections because they're DOJ civil servants, not Article III judges. The Attorney General can fire them and personally decide cases to bind all judges. Demand your representatives support legislation creating independent immigration courts outside DOJ with judges appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate.

I'm calling about the Trump administration firing 90 immigration judges in 2025, targeting judges with high asylum grant rates. Immigration judges lack Article III protections—they're DOJ civil servants the Attorney General can fire at will. This destroys judicial independence. Will the senator support legislation creating independent immigration courts outside DOJ with judges who have lifetime tenure like other federal judges? The 3.7 million people with pending immigration cases deserve neutral adjudication, not deportation machinery.

3

civic action

Support fired immigration judges' legal challenges and union advocacy

The National Association of Immigration Judges and fired judges like Tania Nemer are challenging the mass firings in court. Support their legal defense funds and advocacy efforts to restore judicial independence and protect remaining judges from retaliation for granting asylum.

I want to support legal challenges by fired immigration judges contesting the Trump administration's mass dismissals. The systematic targeting of judges with high asylum grant rates violates judicial independence and due process. How can I donate to legal defense funds for fired judges or support the National Association of Immigration Judges union advocacy protecting remaining judges from retaliation?

4

civic action

Document and report Heritage Foundation watchlist targeting of federal workers

The Heritage Foundation created a 'DHS Bureaucrat Watchlist' to identify 'subversive' federal workers for firing, targeting immigration judges like Amiena Khan. If you're a federal worker who sees yourself or colleagues on similar watchlists, document this targeting and report it to congressional oversight committees and federal employee unions.

I'm a federal employee concerned about the Heritage Foundation's 'DHS Bureaucrat Watchlist' targeting government workers for firing based on their union activity and political views. Immigration Judge Amiena Khan was on this watchlist and was fired on Dec. 1, 2025 after speaking out against DOJ interference in judicial independence. This creates a chilling effect where federal workers fear retaliation for exercising First Amendment rights. How can AFGE protect members from politically motivated firings based on watchlists?