July 3, 2025
Federal judge blocks Trump asylum ban affecting 450,000 migrants
Federal judge blocks Trump's asylum ban as unconstitutional.
July 3, 2025
Federal judge blocks Trump's asylum ban as unconstitutional.
On Jul. 2, 2025, U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss ruled that President Trump’s Jan. 20 “invasion” proclamation barring all migrants at the southern border from seeking asylum exceeded his authority under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).
Judge Moss stayed his injunction for 14 days—until Jul. 16—to give the Department of Justice time to file an appeal.
The nationwide class action covered about 15,000 migrants who had been denied asylum under the proclamation.
The ruling restores migrants’ rights to seek both asylum and withholding of removal under U.S. law.
The court held that only the INA—and not a presidential proclamation—establishes the sole and exclusive procedures for removal and asylum.
President Trump labeled the border situation an “invasion,” although U.S. Customs and Border Protection data showed a 45% decline in apprehensions in the five months before the ban.
How did Moss rule that "necessity" can justify ignoring asylum law in extreme circumstances.
The ruling restores the right to seek “withholding of removal” as well as asylum.
Which outlet first published the full 128-page opinion online?
Trump justified the proclamation by declaring the border an “_____.”
How long did the judge give the administration to appeal before his injunction takes effect?
Upgrade to Premium to access all practice questions and unlock advanced quiz features.
Upgrade to PremiumThese questions are part of the Federal judge blocks Trump asylum ban affecting 450,000 migrants topic. Master this topic by completing the quiz or exploring each question in detail.
Take the full quiz to master this topic and track your progress.
Start QuizActor
Actor
Actor