Skip to main content

January 14, 2026

Senate blocks Venezuela war powers resolution after Vance breaks 50-50 tie

themainemonitor.org
Al Jazeera English
Axios
Congress.gov
NBC News
+3

Five Republicans join Democrats to check Trump's Venezuela military operations

On Jan. 14, 2026, the Senate voted 51-50 to block a war powers resolution sponsored by Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Virginia) that would have forced the Trump administration to seek congressional approval for further military action in Venezuela. Vice President JD Vance traveled to Capitol Hill to cast the tie-breaking vote after the Senate deadlocked 50-50. The resolution would have invoked the Vietnam War-era War Powers Resolution that gives Congress a check on the president's deployments abroad.

Last week, five Republican senators—Josh Hawley (R-Missouri), Todd YoungTodd Young (R-Indiana), Susan Collins (R-Maine), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), and Rand Paul (R-Kentucky)—voted with Democrats to advance the resolution in a stunning defeat for Trump after he ordered the strike that captured Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro. By Wednesday, Hawley and Young had flipped their positions after what Hawley described as "a series of communications with the White House," reducing GOP defectors to three and creating the 50-50 deadlock.

Republicans used a procedural maneuver to kill the resolution, arguing it should no longer be considered "privileged"—which gives it priority on the Senate floor—because the U.S. isn't currently engaged in "hostilities" with Venezuela. Senate Majority Leader John ThuneJohn Thune (R-South Dakota) stated, "We're not currently conducting military operations there. But Democrats are taking up this bill because their anti-Trump hysteria knows no bounds." The procedural vote prevented the Senate from holding a substantive debate on the administration's Venezuela intervention.

Hawley told reporters he changed his mind after reviewing a letter from Secretary of State Marco RubioMarco Rubio that eased his concerns about troops being deployed for a ground operation in Venezuela. Rubio's letter stated, "There are currently no U.S. Armed Forces in Venezuela. Should there be any new military operations that introduce U.S. Armed Forces into hostilities, they will be undertaken consistent with the Constitution of the United States and we will transmit written notifications consistent with section 4(a) of the War Powers Resolution."

Young said in a statement that he changed his mind after receiving assurances from senior national security officials "that there are no American troops in Venezuela" and "a commitment that if President Trump were to determine American forces are needed in major military operations in Venezuela, the Administration will come to Congress in advance to ask for an authorization of force." Despite these assurances, the resolution would have codified this requirement in law rather than relying on Trump's promises.

Trump had publicly attacked the five Republican defectors after last week's vote, calling them out by name on social media and vowing to end their political careers. The president and Rubio personally called Hawley and Young to pressure them to switch votes. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said after the vote, "Senate Republicans continually fall in line behind Donald Trump no matter how reckless, no matter how unconstitutional, no matter the potential cost of American lives. What has happened tonight is a road map to another endless war because this Senate, under Republican leadership, failed to assert its legitimate and needed authority."

Sen. Tim Kaine, who sponsored the resolution, said it was "disappointing that my colleagues let the president sort of beat them into submission." Kaine lamented that the procedural vote would block a public debate on the administration's actions in Venezuela. The vote represents Trump's significant influence over his party and his willingness to attack any member who steps out of line with his agenda. Collins, Murkowski, and Paul maintained their support for the resolution despite White House pressure, but their three votes weren't enough without Hawley and Young.

🌍Foreign Policy📜Constitutional Law🛡️National Security

People, bills, and sources

JD Vance

Vice President of the United States

Josh Hawley

U.S. Senator from Missouri (Republican)

Todd Young

Todd Young

U.S. Senator from Indiana (Republican)

Tim Kaine

U.S. Senator from Virginia (Democrat)

Marco Rubio

Marco Rubio

U.S. Secretary of State

Chuck Schumer

Senate Minority Leader (Democrat)

John Thune

John Thune

Senate Majority Leader (Republican)

Susan Collins

U.S. Senator from Maine (Republican)

What you can do

1

civic action

Contact Senators Hawley and Young about their flip on war powers

Hawley and Young justified switching their votes based on Trump administration "assurances" rather than legally binding requirements. Contact them to demand they explain why they trusted Trump's promises over codifying congressional oversight in law, especially given Trump's track record of breaking commitments to Congress.

"I'm calling about [Senator Hawley/Young]'s flip on the Venezuela war powers resolution.

Key points to mention: • Last week, the senator voted to advance oversight of Trump's military actions in Venezuela • This week, after White House pressure and personal calls from Trump, the senator switched to block the resolution • The senator justified the flip based on Trump's 'assurances' rather than legally binding requirements • Trump publicly threatened to end senators' political careers for voting for oversight • The Constitution gives Congress, not the president, the power to declare war

Question: Why did [Senator] trust Trump's word over codifying congressional authority in law? Did political threats from Trump influence this decision?"

2

civic action

Thank Senators Collins, Murkowski, and Paul for standing firm

Despite intense White House pressure and Trump's public threats, Collins, Murkowski, and Paul maintained their support for congressional war powers oversight. Contact these senators to thank them for defending the Constitution's separation of powers and encourage them to continue standing up to presidential overreach on military actions.

"I'm calling to thank [Senator Collins/Murkowski/Paul] for maintaining support for the Venezuela war powers resolution despite intense White House pressure.

Key points to mention: • Trump publicly threatened to end senators' political careers if they voted for congressional oversight • [Senator] stood firm in defending the Constitution's separation of powers • The Constitution gives Congress authority over military deployments, not the president • [Senator]'s principled stand is exactly what's needed to preserve checks and balances

Question: Please continue to assert congressional war powers authority, regardless of which party controls the White House. Will you support future war powers resolutions for additional military actions?"

3

civic action

Support legislation to strengthen the War Powers Resolution

The 1973 War Powers Resolution was supposed to prevent presidents from waging war without congressional approval, but presidents from both parties have found ways to circumvent it. Contact your representatives to demand they strengthen the War Powers Act to include automatic funding cutoffs for unauthorized military operations and expedited judicial review when presidents claim military actions don't constitute "hostilities."

"I'm calling to urge [Representative Name] to support legislation strengthening the War Powers Resolution.

Key points to mention: • Trump's Venezuela intervention captured a foreign leader but Senate says we're not in 'hostilities' • Presidents exploit the 'hostilities' loophole to avoid congressional oversight • Senate just blocked oversight on a procedural technicality despite Trump capturing a foreign leader • We need automatic funding cutoffs for unauthorized military operations • We need expedited judicial review when presidents claim they're not in 'hostilities'

Question: Will [Representative] introduce or cosponsor legislation to close the 'hostilities' loophole and require automatic funding cutoffs for unauthorized military operations?"