November 24, 2025

Federal judge dismisses indictments against James Comey and Letitia James, ruling Lindsey Halligan appointment unlawful

Court dismisses Trump's prosecutions, ruling special counsel lacked lawful authority to bring charges

On Nov. 24, 2025, a federal judge dismissed indictments against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, ruling that Special Counsel Lindsey Halligan''s appointment violated federal law.

The judge found Attorney General Pam Bondi lacked authority to appoint Halligan because the alleged crimes occurred before Bondi took office, making her appointment of a prosecutor for past events improper.

Trump indicted both Comey and James in January 2025--Comey for allegedly leaking classified information and James for investigating Trump Organization finances.

The dismissal deals a major blow to Trump''s campaign to prosecute his critics.

On Nov. 24, 2025, U.S. District Judge ruled that indictments against James ComeyJames Comey and Letitia JamesLetitia James must be dismissed because Special Counsel Lindsey HalliganLindsey Halligan's appointment violated federal law. The judge found Attorney General Pam BondiPam Bondi lacked authority to appoint Halligan to prosecute alleged crimes that occurred before Bondi became Attorney General. The ruling said appointing a prosecutor to investigate past events involving the current administration's political enemies creates an improper conflict of interest.

Trump indicted James ComeyJames Comey in January 2025 for allegedly leaking classified information during his tenure as FBI director from 2013-2017. The indictment claimed Comey improperly shared details about Trump's connections to Russia with reporters after Trump fired him in May 2017. Comey has maintained he only disclosed unclassified information and acted within his authority to protect the FBI's independence. The indictment came after years of Trump publicly calling for Comey's prosecution.

Trump also indicted Letitia JamesLetitia James in January 2025 for allegedly abusing her authority as New York Attorney General by investigating Trump Organization finances. The indictment claimed James exceeded her state powers and violated federal law by targeting Trump for political reasons. James' office had sued the Trump Organization in September 2022 for fraudulent financial practices, resulting in a $464 million civil judgment against Trump in February 2024. Trump has repeatedly threatened to prosecute James for investigating him.

Attorney General Pam BondiPam Bondi appointed Lindsey HalliganLindsey Halligan as Special Counsel in January 2025 to prosecute both cases. Halligan is a Florida attorney who previously worked for Trump's legal team during his first impeachment trial and represented him in various civil cases. Critics immediately challenged Halligan's appointment, arguing her lack of experience, conflicts of interest, and Bondi's lack of authority to appoint a prosecutor for pre-administration events made the appointment unlawful.

The federal judge's Nov. 24, 2025, ruling found that federal law governing special counsel appointments requires the Attorney General to establish conflicts of interest within the current Justice Department that necessitate an outside prosecutor. The judge ruled Bondi couldn't claim such conflicts for alleged crimes that occurred years before she took office and involved the current president's political enemies. The ruling said allowing this would enable any administration to retroactively prosecute its critics.

The dismissal deals a major blow to Trump's campaign to prosecute critics and political opponents. Since taking office in January 2025, Trump has publicly threatened or initiated investigations into numerous individuals who investigated him or opposed his policies, including Special Counsel Jack Smith, various FBI officials, members of the January 6th Committee, and Democratic lawmakers. The Comey and James prosecutions were the highest-profile cases.

James ComeyJames Comey responded to the dismissal on Nov. 24, saying This was always a politically motivated prosecution designed to punish me for doing my job and protecting the FBI's independence. The rule of law survived this attack, but the threat to our justice system continues. Comey has remained a vocal Trump critic since his 2017 firing and published a book detailing Trump's attempts to influence FBI investigations.

Letitia JamesLetitia James issued a statement saying Justice prevailed today, but we must remain vigilant against attempts to weaponize the federal justice system against state law enforcement. New York will continue holding powerful people accountable regardless of political retaliation. James is currently appealing Trump's attempts to block enforcement of the $464 million civil judgment against the Trump Organization. Attorney General Bondi hasn't commented on whether she'll appeal the dismissals.

⚖️Justice🏛️Government⚖️Justice

What You Can Do

1

civic action

Contact Senate Judiciary Committee demanding oversight of Attorney General Bondi's prosecutorial decisions

The dismissed indictments show Bondi using Justice Department to prosecute Trump's political enemies. Demand oversight hearings investigating whether other politically motivated prosecutions are underway and what safeguards exist.

Hi, I'm calling to demand oversight hearings on Attorney General Bondi's prosecutorial decisions.

Key facts:

  • Federal judge dismissed Comey and James indictments Nov. 24
  • Judge ruled Bondi lacked authority to prosecute crimes from before her tenure
  • Halligan appointment violated federal law
  • Both prosecutions targeted Trump's political enemies

Questions to ask:

  • Will the committee investigate Bondi's other politically motivated prosecutions?
  • What oversight exists over special counsel appointments?
  • Will you establish safeguards against weaponizing the Justice Department?

Request: I want oversight hearings investigating whether other politically motivated prosecutions are underway and establishing safeguards against weaponizing the Justice Department.

Thank you.

2

understanding

Study historical examples of politically motivated prosecutions and their outcomes

Research how other democracies have protected judicial independence from executive abuse, including safeguards against prosecuting political enemies and consequences for leaders who weaponize justice systems.

3

civic action

Support organizations defending judicial independence and rule of law

Organizations like the Brennan Center, Protect Democracy, and American Constitution Society work to defend judicial independence from political interference. Support their advocacy for protecting the justice system from executive abuse.

I am calling to support the Brennan Center's work defending judicial independence.

Context:

  • Trump indicted Comey and James for investigating him
  • Federal judge dismissed both indictments as unlawful
  • Trump has threatened numerous other critics with prosecution
  • The justice system faces ongoing threats from political interference

How I can help:

  • Donate to support your advocacy work
  • Contact my representatives demanding safeguards
  • Share information about threats to judicial independence

Request: Please let me know how I can best support your work defending the justice system from political weaponization.

Thank you.