FBI raids Post reporter covering Trump's federal workforce purge

On Jan. 14, 2026, FBI agents executed a search warrant at the Alexandria, 🏛️Virginia home of 🌲Washington Post reporter HNHannah Natanson, seizing her phone, two laptops, and Garmin watch. This marked the first time in U.S. history that the Justice Department executed a search warrant at a reporter's home in a national security leak case—a 'radical escalation' that even the Obama administration, criticized for aggressive leak investigations, never attempted.

Attorney General Pam Bondi rescinded Biden-era journalist protections on Apr. 25, 2025, three months before the raid. The rescission reversed a 2022 policy that prohibited DOJ from using subpoenas, court orders, or search warrants against journalists for 'receipt, possession, or publication' of classified material. The new policy reverted to a 'balancing test' that weighs law enforcement interests against press freedom, explicitly allowing prosecutors to compel testimony and records from reporters.

The raid targeted Natanson's sources on classified Venezuela intelligence. Natanson co-authored a Jan. 6, 2026 🌲Washington Post story titled 'Maduro raid killed about 75 in Venezuela, U.S. officials assess,' citing government documents obtained by the Post. The story covered a violent Trump-approved military operation to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. FBI Director Kash Patel and AG Bondi alleged Natanson obtained 'classified, sensitive military information' from Pentagon contractor APAurelio Perez-Lugones.

Perez-Lugones, a 🦀Maryland-based system engineer with top secret clearance, was arrested and charged with unlawful retention of national defense information under the Espionage Act. Prosecutors found classified documents marked 'secret' in his home, lunchbox, and car, including reports on Venezuela. During his Jan. 15, 2026 detention hearing, prosecutors revealed Perez-Lugones told federal agents he mishandled classified information because he was angry about 'recent government activity.' Critically, he was charged only with retention—not leaking—yet the government cited speculative risk he 'could disseminate information if released.'

The search warrant exploited a narrow exception in the Privacy Protection Act of 1980, which generally bars warrants against journalists unless they are targets of a crime. By alleging Natanson's devices 'contain classified material,' the Trump administration circumvented the law's core protections designed after the 1978 Zurcher v. Stanford Daily Supreme Court case, which found unannounced newsroom searches could chill press freedom. DOJ claimed neither Natanson nor the Post were 'targets'—but seized her devices anyway.

Natanson, dubbed the 🌲Washington Post's 'federal government whisperer,' had cultivated 1,169 sources while reporting on Trump's transformation of the federal workforce. Her Dec. 24, 2025 article detailed the brutal pace of covering frustrated federal workers under Trump administration changes. The raid functioned as both source identification and intimidation: by seizing all her devices, the FBI gained access to encrypted communications, source lists, and unpublished drafts, while sending a chilling message to potential whistleblowers.

Press freedom advocates and legal experts condemned the raid as unprecedented. TBTheodore Boutrous, a prominent First Amendment attorney, called it 'extraordinarily unusual' and noted search warrants against reporters involve 'very few examples' because they deny journalists the ability to challenge the order beforehand—unlike subpoenas. The Society of Professional Journalists called it 'a grave threat to press freedom,' warning it would deter both reporters and whistleblowers. One expert stated: 'I strongly suspect that the search is meant to deter not just that reporter but other reporters from pursuing stories that are reliant on government whistleblowers.'

The raid occurred amid broader Trump administration attacks on press freedom. FBI Director Kash Patel, confirmed by the Senate 51-49 on Feb. 20, 2025 (with only moderate Republicans Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski opposing), was a Trump loyalist who vowed to crack down on leaks. The administration's actions included a House Oversight Committee subpoena for reporter Seth Harp regarding Venezuela reporting, classified legal memos arguing Trump wasn't constrained by U.S. or international law in the Maduro capture operation, and President Trump publicly mentioning 'the leaker on Venezuela' was found and jailed.