August 22, 2025

Pentagon fires intelligence chief for contradicting Trump's Iran "obliteration" claims

Intelligence officials fired for contradicting war propaganda

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth fired Lt. Gen. Jeffrey Kruse, head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, on August 22, 2025, after Kruse's agency assessed that US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities only delayed Iran's program by "a matter of months."

Trump had declared Iran's nuclear facilities "completely and totally obliterated" and set back "basically decades." The firing follows systematic purges of intelligence professionals who provide accurate but politically inconvenient analysis.

Lt. Gen. Jeffrey Kruse was fired as Defense Intelligence Agency director on August 22, 2025, three days after his agency concluded US airstrikes on Iran only delayed nuclear enrichment by months. Kruse, a 30-year intelligence veteran, lost his job for contradicting Trump's claims that Iran's facilities were completely obliterated and set back decades.

Trump declared during his June 21 televised address that Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated, repeating the claim multiple times on Truth Social. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth echoed Trump at a Pentagon press conference, stating Iran's nuclear ambitions have been obliterated and calling the operation bold and brilliant.

The DIA's classified five-page preliminary assessment, based on battle damage analysis by US Central Command, found that Iran's enriched uranium stockpiles remained intact and the nuclear program was delayed less than six months. Intelligence officials confirmed that key components at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan nuclear facilities survived the bombing campaign.

FactCheck.org verified that Trump's obliteration claims were false, confirming intelligence assessments that Iran's nuclear enrichment capability remains viable. Independent satellite analysis by nuclear experts at Middlebury Institute showed significant damage but not destruction of Iran's nuclear infrastructure or uranium stocks.

Senator Mark WarnerMark Warner criticized Kruse's firing as evidence the Trump administration treats intelligence as a loyalty test rather than a safeguard, warning that political retaliation against accurate analysis endangers national security. Warner noted this follows patterns of punishing CIA and FBI officials for Russia investigation findings.

The Pentagon declined to specify whether Kruse was forced out or the reasons for his removal, maintaining official silence while career intelligence officers across agencies face termination for providing factual assessments. White House Press Secretary Karoline LeavittKaroline Leavitt dismissed leaked intelligence reports as flat-out wrong despite multiple confirmation sources.

Iran's nuclear program continues enriching uranium at 60% purity levels unprecedented for states without nuclear weapons, according to International Atomic Energy Agency monitoring. Military planners require accurate threat assessments to develop effective containment strategies, not politically convenient narratives that ignore enemy capabilities.

🛡️National Security🌍Foreign Policy🔐Ethics🏛️Government

People, bills, and sources

What You Can Do

1

Contact Senate Intelligence Committee at 202-224-1700 demanding congressional oversight hearings on systematic intelligence community purges for accurate analysis

2

Support S.1234 Intelligence Professional Protection Act preventing political appointees from firing career officers for contradicting presidential narratives with facts

3

Call Senator Mark Warner at 202-224-2023 requesting investigation into retaliation against DIA, CIA, and FBI officials for providing Congress honest intelligence assessments

4

Join Project on Government Oversight at pogo.org supporting whistleblower protections for intelligence professionals facing political retaliation for accurate reporting

5

Contact House Intelligence Committee demanding declassification of Iran nuclear program assessments to verify administration claims against professional intelligence analysis

6

Support Federation of American Scientists at fas.org defending independent intelligence analysis from political interference threatening national security decision-making

7

Pressure appropriations committees to protect intelligence community funding from administration attempts to punish agencies for inconvenient but accurate assessments