Skip to main content

July 25, 2024

California Supreme Court upholds Prop 22 gig worker classification

Ballotpedia
CalMatters
CalMatters
Laist
leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
+11

Uber, Lyft, DoorDash keep 1.4 million workers as contractors after $200 million campaign

The California Supreme Court unanimously upheld Proposition 22 on Jul. 25, 2024 in Castellanos v. State of California. The ruling allows app-based gig companies like Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash to legally classify their drivers as independent contractors instead of employees.

Proposition 22 passed in November 2020 with 58% voter support. Gig companies spent over $200 million on the campaign, making it the most expensive ballot measure in California history at the time. Labor unions and worker advocates raised only about $20 million to oppose it.

Justice Goodwin Liu wrote the opinion, ruling that California's Constitution doesn't bar voters from passing initiatives on matters affecting workers' compensation. The court held that the term 'unlimited' legislative power over workers' compensation is 'ambiguous' and doesn't give the legislature sole authority.

The SEIU and four drivers (Hector Castellanos, Saori Okawa, and Michael Robinson) challenged Prop 22 arguing it unconstitutionally stripped workers of labor protections. An Alameda Superior Court judge initially struck down Prop 22 in August 2021, but appeals courts reversed that ruling.

Prop 22 promises gig workers 120% of minimum wage for 'active' time only. Time spent waiting for rides or deliveries doesn't count toward minimum wage calculations, often the majority of logged-in hours. This dramatically reduces actual hourly pay.

California hasn't effectively enforced Prop 22's wage and benefit promises. Workers have no effective recourse when companies shortchange them. Studies found many gig workers earn between $6 and $12 per hour after expenses, well below California's $16 minimum wage.

More than 1.4 million Californians work as app-based gig workers for companies like Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, and Instacart. The ruling affects access to overtime, paid sick leave, unemployment insurance, and workers' compensation.

The court's ruling left open whether the legislature could pass new laws providing benefits to gig workers. Such laws wouldn't violate Prop 22 as long as they aren't considered amendments to it. Prop 22 requires a seven-eighths legislative supermajority to amend.

🔍Policy Analysis

Ready to test your knowledge?

Take the full quiz to master this topic and track your progress.

Start Quiz

People, bills, and sources

Goodwin Liu

California Supreme Court Justice

Frank Roesch

Alameda County Superior Court Judge

Hector Castellanos

Rideshare driver and lead plaintiff

Gavin Newsom

Gavin Newsom

California Governor

What you can do

1

civic action

Demand California legislature expand gig worker protections after Supreme Court upheld Prop 22 leaving 1.4 million app-based workers as contractors

The Supreme Court's ruling leaves room for the Legislature to pass new laws providing benefits to gig workers. Push your representatives to expand protections for California's 1.4 million app-based workers.

2

civic action

Support ballot initiatives to repeal Proposition 22

Since Prop 22 requires a seven-eighths legislative supermajority to amend, a new ballot initiative is the most realistic path to change. Join labor unions and worker advocacy groups organizing repeal efforts.

3

legal assistance

Report Prop 22 violations to California Labor Commissioner

Even under Prop 22, gig companies must provide the limited benefits promised. If you're not receiving healthcare subsidies, minimum wage for engaged time, or expense reimbursement, file a complaint.

4

research

Track wage theft lawsuits against gig companies

Uber and Lyft drivers rallied at California city halls in 2025 over thousands of wage theft claims that could total billions in backpay. Follow lawsuit developments through worker advocacy organizations.