February 3, 2026
Judge considers shutting down Epstein files website after improper victim disclosure
DOJ removes thousands of documents after improper victim disclosures
February 3, 2026
DOJ removes thousands of documents after improper victim disclosures
DOJ inadvertently published unredacted Epstein-related court documents online February 1, 2026. The publication revealed personal information of nearly 100 survivors without protection, including names, addresses, and contact details that should have been redacted for privacy.
Victims attorneys filed emergency motions for immediate takedown of private information on February 1, 2026. The legal teams argued that the privacy breach violated court orders and put survivors at risk of retaliation, harassment, and further trauma.
Judge Loretta Preska granted temporary takedown order on February 2, 2026 to protect victim privacy. The federal judge ordered the immediate removal of personal information and authorized penalties for non-compliance with privacy protection orders.
Thousands of documents were pulled for re-redaction to protect victim privacy. The massive document removal created delays in public access to court records while officials worked to properly redact sensitive information before republishing.
The publication exposed broader concerns about privacy protections in sensitive court cases. The breach highlighted the need for better systems to protect victim information in high-profile cases involving sexual assault and trafficking.
DOJ officials acknowledged the error and pledged overhauls to prevent future privacy breaches. The department implemented new procedures for document review and redaction to ensure compliance with court privacy protection orders.
Victim advocacy organizations condemned the breach as deeply harmful to survivors. Groups representing sexual assault survivors argued that the privacy violation could discourage future reporting and cooperation with investigations.
The incident occurred amid ongoing efforts to provide justice and support to Epstein survivors. The privacy breach undermined trust in the justice system and created additional trauma for victims who had already suffered significant harm.
Federal prosecutors faced criticism for inadequate privacy protection measures. The DOJ was criticized for failing to properly review and redact documents before publication, raising questions about competency in handling sensitive case materials.
U.S. District Judge
Department of Justice
Legal representatives
Victim advocacy organization
Digital rights organization