Skip to main content

April 11, 2026

Secretary Mullin recalls DHS workforce using alternative funds during 59-day shutdown

Federal News Network
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency
Congress.gov
Lii / Legal Information Institute

DHS uses One Big Beautiful Bill Act money to pay employees without congressional appropriation

On April 11, 2026, DHS Secretary Markwayne MullinMarkwayne Mullin ordered all furloughed DHS employees back to work, citing 31 U.S.C. Section 1301(a) as legal authority to fund operations without congressional appropriation. The recall included approximately 1,200 CISA employees—60% of its 2,000-person workforce. In a CBS News interview, Mullin described the provision as allowing DHS "a little bit of flexibility ... with the dollars that were set up to allow us to do stuff just like this."

Mullin pledged back pay through April 4, 2026, with paychecks distributed April 10-16. This payment covered nearly two months of lost wages for tens of thousands of federal employees. Executive authority funded the entire obligation rather than a new congressional appropriation. The move raised constitutional questions about whether the executive branch could unilaterally obligate federal funds without legislative approval.

The Antideficiency Act, enacted in 1870 and strengthened in 1884 and 1905, governs executive spending authority. Codified at 31 U.S.C. § 1341, it prohibits federal officials from making expenditures or creating obligations exceeding available appropriations unless authorized by law.

This provision implements Article One, Section 9's "power of the purse" requirement that only Congress may authorize federal spending. Violations carry criminal penalties of up to two years imprisonment and substantial fines.

Mullin invoked 31 U.S.C. Section 1301(a), which states that appropriations shall be applied only to the objects for which they were made except as otherwise provided by law. His interpretation stretched the statute's ordinary meaning: rather than deploying already-appropriated funds toward their original purpose, he used it to justify entirely new spending (federal payroll) that Congress had explicitly declined to fund.

Constitutional and budget law scholars questioned whether this violated the Antideficiency Act. The administration never formally published its legal basis, preventing public scrutiny or congressional challenge.

CISA operates as America's primary civilian cybersecurity defense institution, defending critical infrastructure—power grids, hospitals, water systems, financial networks, and election systems—against cyberattacks and state-sponsored threats. During the 56-day shutdown, approximately 1,200 of CISA's 2,000 employees (60%) were furloughed, leaving the agency at 38-40% capacity.

The agency halted vulnerability assessments, suspended simulation exercises and stakeholder trainings, and froze deployment of cybersecurity services and real-time threat guidance that federal agencies and state/local partners depend on. CISA delayed the final rule for the Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act, suspended international cybersecurity engagements, cancelled assessments for critical infrastructure owners, and eliminated real-time threat warnings that state and local agencies rely upon.

The DHS shutdown began February 14, 2026, after Congress deadlocked over immigration enforcement policy. Democrats refused to pass DHS funding for ICE and CBP unless the agencies implemented reforms including mandatory body camera use, clear identification requirements, and safeguards against racial profiling—demands prompted by the January 2026 deaths of Alex Pretti and Renee Nicole Good, who were shot by DHS immigration agents in Minneapolis.

Republicans, led by House Speaker Mike JohnsonMike Johnson, declared these Democratic conditions non-starters and refused to fund DHS without preserving unfettered authority for ICE and CBP operations. When both chambers recessed February 12 without voting on a continuing resolution, the lapse became inevitable. Senate Republicans blocked more than a dozen funding bills to pay TSA agents, fund FEMA, and support cyber defense during the standoff. Trump told reporters he was "pretty much not happy" with any deal and demanded Republicans not negotiate without his SAVE America Act voting legislation.

On April 1, 2026, after 47 days of shutdown, Speaker Mike JohnsonMike Johnson, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, and Senate Budget Chair Lindsey Graham announced a two-track plan to bypass Democrats entirely. Congress would fund most DHS components—including TSA, CBP officers, CISA, and Secret Service—through normal appropriations requiring 60 Senate votes. Republicans would simultaneously use budget reconciliation to fund ICE and Border Patrol separately, requiring only 51 votes and bypassing the Senate filibuster.

Trump backed the plan on Truth Social, calling for legislation by June 1 and writing that Republicans would fund ICE and Border Patrol "through a process that doesn't need Radical Left Democrat votes, and bypasses the Senate Filibuster." When Congress returned April 13, the two-track approach became the framework for ending the shutdown.

The 56-day DHS shutdown (February 14–April 11, 2026) became the longest department-specific appropriations lapse in U.S. history. By comparison, the 2018-2019 government shutdown lasted 35 days and affected the entire federal government. That shutdown cost an estimated $5 billion in economic impact and resulted in Trump declaring a national emergency to redirect Defense Department funds toward wall construction after Congress declined to appropriate the requested $5.7 billion.

The 1995-1996 Clinton-era shutdown lasted 21 days. The 56-day DHS shutdown exceeded all three previous major shutdowns in duration for the affected agency, suggesting department-specific funding lapses may pose greater endurance challenges than whole-of-government shutdowns where economic damage and political pressure force faster resolution.

🏛️Government🏢Legislative Process📜Constitutional Law👷Labor

People, bills, and sources

Markwayne Mullin

Markwayne Mullin

DHS Secretary

President Donald Trump

President

Mike Johnson

Mike Johnson

House Speaker

John Thune

Senate Majority Leader

Nick Andersen

CISA Acting Director

Congressional Democrats

Opposition Party

Congressional Republicans

Majority Party

Legal experts on appropriations law

Constitutional scholars

What you can do

1

Legislative Advocacy

Contact your representative and senators about passing a clean DHS appropriation

Congress returns April 13 to negotiate DHS funding. Contact your House representative and both senators to urge them to pass a DHS appropriation that funds all agencies equally and ends the shutdown immediately, rather than splitting the bill through reconciliation. Ask them why immigration enforcement funding should be separated from routine DHS operations.

Hi, I'm calling to ask [representative name] to vote yes on a clean DHS appropriation that ends the 56-day shutdown and funds all DHS agencies, including ICE and Border Patrol, in a single bill.

2

Government Accountability

Track CISA's operational recovery after the shutdown

Visit CISA.gov and subscribe to alerts about cybersecurity guidance. CISA must rebuild its workforce and clear the backlog of vulnerability reports, incident warnings, and security advice delayed during the shutdown. Monitor whether CISA publishes updated threat assessments and whether it restores its town halls on the Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act.

Check the CISA homepage for its operational status and subscribe to critical infrastructure alerts to see how quickly the agency recovers from the 56-day shutdown.

3

Constitutional Accountability

Engage with your senators on Antideficiency Act enforcement

Ask your senators whether they believe the Antideficiency Act permits the president to pay 100,000+ workers for two months using flexibility authority, or whether this was a violation that Congress should investigate. Request they clarify the limits of presidential spending flexibility and whether Congress should amend the law to prevent future executive workarounds.

Hi, I'm calling to ask [senator name] whether they believe the Antideficiency Act permits the president to pay DHS workers during a shutdown without a new congressional appropriation, or whether this violated the law.