Skip to main content

February 4, 2026

House passes bill fast-tracking mining on federal lands

Clerk House
Earthworks
Visual Capitalist
Wikipedia
Rep. Jared Huffman
+20

Mining companies get fast-tracked federal approvals for critical minerals

The House voted 224-195 to pass H.R. 4090 on February 4, 2026. Ten Democrats joined Republicans in support while one Republican voted against, making the vote mostly but not entirely along party lines. Rep. Pete Stauber (R-MN), chairman of the House Natural Resources Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources, sponsored the legislation. The House Rules Committee reported the rule for floor consideration (H. Res. 1032) by a vote of 8-4 on February 2, 2026. The procedural rule itself barely passed the House 217-215 on February 3.

The bill codifies several of President Trump's executive orders aimed at boosting domestic mining and processing of critical minerals. Executive Order 14241, 'Immediate Measures to Increase American Mineral Production,' already directed similar actions. The Critical Mineral Dominance Act puts these directives into law so they survive future administrations. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, who has championed expanded domestic mineral production, would oversee implementation.

The bill's main requirement directs Interior Secretary Doug Burgum's department to identify priority mining projects on federal lands within 10 days of enactment. This extremely short timeline limits Interior's ability to conduct thorough review of environmental impacts, tribal concerns, or competing land uses. Once projects are identified, Interior must 'take all necessary and appropriate steps to expedite' their approval.

Interior must suspend, revise, or rescind any agency actions that place 'undue burdens' on mining projects. This gives the department broad authority to weaken or eliminate environmental regulations, permitting requirements, and review processes. The bill does not define 'undue burdens,' leaving interpretation to Interior officials. This could include National Environmental Policy Act reviews, Endangered Species Act consultations, or Clean Water Act permitting.

The legislation covers hardrock mining on National Forest System land, public lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management, and any land that may be leased for hardrock mineral exploration and production. This includes millions of acres across the western United States. Hardrock minerals include copper, lithium, cobalt, nickel, and rare earth elements used in batteries, electronics, and clean energy technology.

The bill requires Interior, in consultation with the Agriculture Department, to submit to Congress a list of pending mining project applications and active, inactive, or proposed mining projects on federal land. Interior must also recommend changes to current law necessary to expand U.S. production of hardrock minerals and review state and local laws that impede domestic mining. This provision signals potential federal preemption of state environmental regulations.

Supporters frame the bill as essential for national security and reducing dependence on China, which controls significant portions of global supply chains for rare earth elements and battery minerals. The mining industry and labor groups view expanding domestic production as critical for electric vehicle manufacturing, defense applications, and clean energy infrastructure.

House Natural Resources Ranking Member Jared HuffmanJared Huffman (D-CA) led Democratic opposition, calling the bill a 'corporate giveaway' that 'hands the mining industry the power to gut its own regulations.' Huffman warned the bill creates no safeguards against prioritizing mines owned by foreign adversaries, fails to focus on minerals needed for clean energy or defense, and would allow mining on sensitive public lands including national parks. The National Parks Conservation Association noted over 120,000 active mining claims exist within 30 miles of national parks.

The Senate received the bill on February 5, 2026, and referred it to the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. Senate passage is not guaranteed. The partisan 224-195 House vote shows Republicans prioritizing supply chain security and economic development while Democrats emphasize environmental review and tribal consultation.

🏛️Government

People, bills, and sources

Pete Stauber

U.S. Representative (R-MN-8), Chairman of House Natural Resources Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources

Doug Burgum

U.S. Secretary of the Interior

Jared Huffman

Jared Huffman

U.S. Representative (D-CA), Ranking Member of House Natural Resources Committee

Bruce Westerman

Bruce Westerman

U.S. Representative (R-AR-4), Chairman of House Natural Resources Committee

What you can do

1

civic action

Contact your senator about environmental review and tribal consultation requirements

The bill now sits with the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee after being referred there on February 5. Senators can demand amendments requiring tribal consultation, maintaining NEPA environmental reviews, defining 'undue burdens' more narrowly, and adding safeguards against foreign adversary-owned mines. Contact your senators to express views on balancing mining acceleration with environmental protection.

I am calling about H.R. 4090, the Critical Mineral Dominance Act that passed the House 224-195 on February 4. The bill fast-tracks mining on federal lands with minimal environmental review and no tribal consultation requirements. Will the Senator support amendments requiring tribal consultation before mining approvals? Will they maintain National Environmental Policy Act reviews? The 10-day timeline for identifying priority projects is too short for thorough review.

2

transparency

Track your representative's vote on H.R. 4090

The official roll call vote (Roll Call 55) is publicly available. Check how your representative voted on H.R. 4090. Ten Democrats joined Republicans in support while one Republican voted against, making this a mostly partisan but not entirely party-line vote. Understanding your representative's position helps you engage them on mining and environmental policy.

3

education

Learn about mining claims near national parks in your area

The National Parks Conservation Association tracks over 120,000 active mining claims within 30 miles of national parks and monuments. Research whether parks near you face mining pressure, and understand what the Critical Mineral Dominance Act would mean for those lands. The NPCA provides tools and analysis to help citizens understand the impact of mining policy on public lands.