Skip to main content

January 26, 2026

Hours after Border Patrol kills Minneapolis man, Bondi demands voter rolls to restore 'law and order'

Constitution Congress
National Constitution Center
KSTP
Stateline
Brennan Center for Justice
+7

Federal courts call data demands "unprecedented and illegal"

On Jan. 25, 2026, Attorney General Pam BondiPam Bondi sent a three-page letter to Minnesota Gov. Tim WalzTim Walz requesting the repeal of sanctuary policies, cooperation from all detention facilities with ICE, state records on Medicaid and food stamps for fraud investigations, and DOJ Civil Rights Division access to state voter rolls to confirm voter registration compliance with federal law. The letter stated You and your office must restore the rule of law, support ICE officers, and bring an end to the chaos in Minnesota. The letter came during Operation Metro Surge, which deployed 3,000 federal agents to Minnesota and resulted in over 2,500 arrests. The DOJ was also investigating Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey for allegedly impeding federal immigration enforcement through public statements.

U.S. District Judge David O. Carter dismissed California's lawsuit on Jan. 15, 2026, in a 33-page ruling calling the government's request unprecedented and illegal. Carter wrote that the DOJ's request for sensitive information of Californians stands to have a chilling effect on American citizens like political minority groups and working-class immigrants who may consider not registering to vote or skip casting a ballot because they're worried about how their information will be used. The Clinton-appointed judge called the suit a telltale fishing expedition and wrote that even the federal government is not permitted to sue first, obtain discovery, and finalize its allegations later. He noted the Department of Justice seeks to use civil rights legislation which was enacted for an entirely different purpose to amass and retain an unprecedented amount of confidential voter data.

U.S. District Judge Mustafa Kasubhai tentatively ruled to dismiss Oregon's lawsuit on Jan. 15, 2026, during oral arguments. The Biden-appointed judge stated I'm very cautious and doubtful that what you're asking for, which is an unredacted list, is actually going to give you the information that you need to establish a violation of voting laws. Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read responded that the federal government tried to abuse their power to force me to break my oath of office and hand over your private data. I stood up to them and said no. Now, the court sided with us. The tentative ruling was pending a written decision.

DHS confirmed on Sept. 11, 2025, that voter registration data collected by DOJ is being shared with the Department of Homeland Security as part of a broad push to remove noncitizens from the rolls. A DHS spokesperson stated This collaboration with the DOJ will lawfully and critically enable DHS to prevent illegal aliens from corrupting our republic's democratic process and further ensure the integrity of our elections nationwide. The data is run through the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements program, which USCIS refashioned in spring 2025 to conduct bulk searches instead of one-name-at-a-time checks. The New York Times reported the administration plans to compare voter data to DHS databases to find registered voters listed as noncitizens.

On Nov. 18, 2025, ten Democratic secretaries of state from Colorado, California, Minnesota, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, Maine, Vermont, Oregon, and Washington sent a joint letter to Bondi and DHS Secretary Kristi NoemKristi Noem expressing immense concern with recent reporting that the Department of Justice has shared voter data with the Department of Homeland Security. The letter sought clarity on whether DOJ and DHS actively misled election officials regarding the uses of voter data. The officials alleged senior DOJ and DHS officials shared misleading and at times contradictory information during an Aug. meeting with senior election staff. Collectively, the ten states represent about 26% of all registered voters in the United States. The secretaries requested a response by Dec. 1, 2025.

The DOJ sued 23 states and Washington D.C. for refusing to provide unredacted voter rolls. The first wave on Sept. 25, 2025, sued California, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, New Hampshire, and Pennsylvania. The second wave on Dec. 3, 2025, sued Delaware, Maryland, New Mexico, Rhode Island, and Vermont. All states are led by Democrats or were lost by Trump in the 2020 election. Bondi argued she's authorized under the National Voter Registration Act, Help America Vote Act, and Civil Rights Act of 1960 to ensure that states have proper and effective voter registration and voter list maintenance programs. She stated Clean voter rolls are the foundation of free and fair elections. Every state has a responsibility to ensure that voter registration records are accurate, accessible, and secure — states that don't fulfill that obligation will see this Department of Justice in court.

Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon declined the Jul. 2025 DOJ request, stating the department provided no legal basis for the demand and failed to explain how the data would be used, stored, or secured. He said This is not normal. This is a sweeping request for very personal, very private data on millions of Minnesota voters. Simon's office moved to dismiss the federal lawsuit on Dec. 23, 2025, with a hearing set for Mar. 2026. California Secretary of State Shirley WeberShirley Weber declined to provide the data, citing state privacy laws and offering redacted versions instead. The DOJ sought unredacted files for 23 million California voters including names, addresses, birthdates, driver's license numbers, and last four digits of Social Security numbers.

Noncitizen voting is extremely rare in U.S. elections. One study of the 2016 election placed the prevalence at 0.0001% of votes cast. Brennan Center research found incident rates between 0.0003% and 0.0025%. Indiana Republican Secretary of State Diego Morales and Alabama Republican Secretary of State Wes Allen signed agreements with USCIS to access citizenship verification databases, demonstrating GOP cooperation with the administration's voter data collection efforts. Trump's Mar. 2025 executive order directed Bondi to seek information about suspected election crimes from state election officials and empowered her to potentially withhold grants and other funds from uncooperative states.

🗳️Elections🛂ImmigrationCivil Rights🏛️Government

People, bills, and sources

Pam Bondi

Pam Bondi

U.S. Attorney General

Tim Walz

Tim Walz

Minnesota Governor

David O. Carter

U.S. District Judge, Central District of California (Clinton appointee)

Mustafa Kasubhai

U.S. District Judge, District of Oregon (Biden appointee)

Kristi Noem

Kristi Noem

Secretary of Homeland Security

Steve Simon

Minnesota Secretary of State

Shirley Weber

Shirley Weber

California Secretary of State

Tobias Read

Oregon Secretary of State

What you can do

1

civic action

Contact state secretaries of state supporting voter data lawsuits

Demand they continue resisting DOJ overreach and protecting voter privacy from immigration enforcement misuse

nass@sso.org

Hi, I'm calling to support secretaries of state resisting DOJ voter data demands and to demand continued protection of voter privacy.

Key points to mention:

  • Federal courts in California and Oregon called DOJ demands unprecedented and illegal
  • DHS confirmed sharing voter data with immigration enforcement
  • 10 secretaries of state alleged DOJ and DHS actively misled officials
  • Voter data shouldn't be weaponized for immigration enforcement

Questions to ask:

  • What steps are secretaries of state taking to coordinate resistance to DOJ demands?
  • How can citizens support legal challenges to protect voter privacy?

Specific request: I want secretaries of state to continue fighting DOJ lawsuits and refuse to share unredacted voter data that could be used for immigration enforcement.

Thank you for your time.

2

civic action

Support ACLU litigation challenging DOJ voter data collection

The ACLU successfully intervened in California and is fighting similar cases nationwide to protect voter privacy

I want to support ACLU litigation protecting voter privacy from DOJ overreach and immigration enforcement misuse.

Key points to mention:

  • ACLU intervened in California and won dismissal on Jan. 15, 2026
  • Judge Carter called DOJ demands unprecedented and illegal
  • DHS is sharing voter data with immigration enforcement
  • This creates chilling effect on minority and immigrant voters

Questions to ask:

  • How can I support ongoing litigation in the 23 states facing DOJ lawsuits?
  • What resources does ACLU need to fight voter data collection nationwide?

Specific request: I want to donate to or volunteer for ACLU efforts defending voter privacy against federal overreach.

Thank you for your work.

3

civic action

Demand congressional oversight of DOJ-DHS voter data sharing

Contact House and Senate Judiciary Committees to investigate whether DOJ and DHS actively misled officials about voter data uses

Hi, I'm calling to demand congressional oversight of DOJ and DHS voter data sharing for immigration enforcement.

Key points to mention:

  • 10 secretaries of state alleged DOJ and DHS actively misled officials
  • DHS confirmed sharing voter data with immigration enforcement via SAVE system
  • Federal courts called DOJ demands unprecedented and illegal
  • This creates chilling effect discouraging voter registration

Questions to ask:

  • Will the committee investigate whether DOJ and DHS misled state officials?
  • What oversight mechanisms exist to prevent voter data misuse?

Specific request: I want congressional hearings on DOJ-DHS voter data sharing and legislation preventing voter data from being used for immigration enforcement.

Thank you for your time.

4

civic action

File privacy complaints with state attorneys general

Report DOJ attempts to circumvent state privacy laws protecting voter registration data

I want to file a complaint about DOJ attempts to circumvent state privacy laws protecting voter registration data.

Key points to mention:

  • DOJ sued 23 states seeking unredacted voter data
  • Federal courts in California and Oregon dismissed lawsuits
  • DHS is sharing voter data with immigration enforcement
  • This violates state privacy protections

Questions to ask:

  • What is my state's position on DOJ voter data demands?
  • How can citizens support state resistance to federal overreach?

Specific request: I want the attorney general to defend state privacy laws and refuse to comply with DOJ voter data demands.

Thank you.