Who was Comey's defense attorney who argued "there is no indictment" because the full jury never reviewed it?

Question

Accepted Answer

Michael Dreeben, Comey's defense attorney and former Deputy Solicitor General, argued that "there is no indictment" because the full grand jury never reviewed the final charging document. Dreeben is one of the nation's leading criminal law experts. He previously served as special counsel to Robert Mueller during the Russia investigation. Dreeben told Judge Nachmanoff that the procedural error violated fundamental grand jury requirements and constitutional protections, meaning the statute of limitations on the charges has lapsed. He argued that allowing a coordinator to edit an indictment after the jury votes, without full jury review, creates an invalid charging document.

Who was Comey's defense attorney who argued "there is no indictment" because the full jury never reviewed it?

Explanation

Sources

Related Questions

PRINCIPLE

EXPLORE

RESOURCES