Which two administrative rules did the Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules (JCRAR) block, prompting the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s July 8, 2025 decision in Evers v. Marklein II (2023AP002020-OA)?
Provide a brief explanation in your own words.
Explanation
In Evers v. Marklein (2023AP002020-OA), decided July 8, 2025, the Wisconsin Supreme Court struck down Wis. Stat. §§ 227.19(5)(c),(d),(dm) and 227.26(2)(d),(im) as facially unconstitutional for allowin...
Sources
- Evers v. Marklein, 2025 WI 48 - Justia
- WI Supreme Court Curtails Legislative Committee’s Rule Making Authority - Urban Milwaukee
- Wisconsin Supreme Court clears the way for a conversion therapy ban to be made permanent - The Washington Post
- Clearinghouse Rule CR 19-166 Rule Text - Wisconsin Legislature
- JCRAR Record of Committee Proceedings (Jan. 12, 2023) - Wisconsin Legislature
Related Questions
Wisconsin gave its Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules strong-form veto and indefinite suspension powers over state regulations. Was Wisconsin unique among U.S. states in granting this much legislative power?
Easytrue falseIn Evers v. Marklein (2025 WI 36), how many affirmative votes—out of the ten-member Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules (JCRAR)—were sufficient to indefinitely block an administrative rule under Wis. Stat. §§ 227.19(5)(c),(d),(dm) and 227.26(2)(d),(im), delaying regulations that affect all 5.96 million Wisconsin residents? (Wis. Stat. § 13.56 (2024); Evers v. Marklein
Easymultiple choiceWhich LGBTQ+ policy did the Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules (JCRAR) repeatedly block under Gov. Tony Evers" administration?
Easymultiple choice
2 more questions available with Premium
Unlock All QuestionsThis question is part of Wisconsin Supreme Court strikes down GOP legislative veto power. 5 more questions available.