Explanation

The headline omits evidence standards and seller incentives. It fails to note who funded the claim or typical costs. Readers can't judge credibility when articles omit methods and funding.

Sources

Related Questions

• Order these deck-method precedents chronologically

  Medium

  timeline

• Which actor benefits financially from selling a 'practice deck' product?

  Medium

  multiple choice

• If a city wants to fund free practice decks for youth, what trade-offs emerge?

  Medium

  scenario simulation